This week, I found the stupid blog post 2 searches on Google Blog Search. This person, or group of people, supposedly tons of reasons why Obama deserved the Nobel Peace Prize. Ironic, considering escalating a war in the Middle East doesn’t exactly fall into what the committee would normally define “peace” as, nor does it confirm that Obama makes good on his promises. But, enough from me, let’s get to the post. (The post is written by The Kansas City Star Editorial Board, which at first glance looked like they were calling themselves the Star Editorial Board of Kansas City.)

http://voices.kansascity.com/node/6163 – I only ask of you one thing: If you give these blogtards hits by clicking on the link, at least toss them a comment telling them why they’re wrong.

Now, this is the part that I had planned on analyzing the stupid points made by the blogtard in question, and I had tons and tons of ideas as I read this post, until I reached the last line of their horribly spliced together mess:

“And, sometimes, hope is worth rewarding.”

And that, my friends, is the perfect way to define blogtard.

A questioner chimes in, “Why would he do it?”

“He’s a jackass,” Obama replies, which is met with laughter from several people.

The president seems to quickly realize he may have gone too far, and jovially appeals to those assembled that the remark be kept private. “Come on guys,” he says. “Cut the president some slack. I’ve got a lot of other stuff on my plate.”

Obama was smart in the fact he was right about something, finally and about time but….

He as our leader made the mistake of keeping a watch on his mouth. He is the president, and what he wants to keep secrect, and hidden he shouldnt say about in public situations, on or off the record, if people are around to hear it and you don’t want them to hear it…DON’T SAY IT!..

In other news concerning the Democrat party as a whole, I must bring up the outburst from Rep. Wilson. President Carter is now calling the our burt “based on racism”. Wilson’s son came forth and said, “It’s unfortunate people make that jump. People can disagree — and appropriately disagree — on issues of substance, but when they make the jump to race it’s absolutely ludicrous. My brothers and I were raised by our parents to respect everyone regardless of background or race.” I put the main point of that in bold, because that is exactly what is happening in the upper levels of our country.

Carter had said, “I think it’s based on racism, there is an inherent feeling among many in this country that an African-American should not be president.”  There are too many people in America who have no idea what anything is that the Government is taking part of, but that doesn’t mean if they disagree with socialized healthcare (whose name defines itself) they are racist by any means.

At the same time, it appears that we, the United States, are making more enemies than pseudo-friends. Many European countries, including Czech Republic and Poland (the countries that were each supposed to host parts of the defense system), are angry that the United States has shown such a sign of weakness.

Even though the current administration, says that they have opted to build a different system that may include ships and perhaps land missiles as well, there was no clear or exact plan in place. At any rate, the European countries in question seem to be angry that the United States is backing out on a promise to put this defense complex in place. According to Times Online, a former Czech Republic Prime Minister has said, “It puts us in a position where we are not firmly anchored in terms of partnership, security and alliance, and that’s a certain threat.”

What is your stance? Let’s hear from you in the comments and in the poll

(NOTE: If you are reading this post in the form of a Note on Facebook please click through to the actual blog to make a comment. http://jibbli.com/2009/09/qotw-missile-defense-in-europe/.)

• My first question is free, really? Don’t they need to raise taxes a ridiculous amount for this to work? So, we end up paying for healthcare anyway, but in this case we’re paying for a crappy version of what we have now.
• If the government can’t do anything right (IRS, Social Security, fix the economy, etc.) why would we think that they could improve our healthcare? NOTE: I’m not kidding. I do try to look at issues from other viewpoints than mine, but I can’t see how anyone could think differently on this one. Seriously, If you have a decent answer let me know in the comments.
• Why on earth would the United States of America want to demote it’s healthcare? There are people who have to come over here from Canada because they can’t get the treatment they need in their country to save their lives. Don’t believe me? Go ahead and Google “Lindsay McCreith.”
• Want healthcare to be a right? Good because it already is.

Anybody ever ask you to explain or define a right?  You may know what it is, but have you ever tried to tell somebody what it is?  “A right is not a guarantee that the government (i.e., other people) will provide you something for free.” A right does not come because the government grants it.  “We have the right to engage in religious expression, but that doesn’t mean that the government pays for the construction of the church.  We have the right to peacefully assemble, but the government doesn’t promise to supply your transportation,” to get you there unless you’re Obama and have ACORN.

-Rush Limbaugh

Here’s an idea. Let’s not ruin the best healthcare system in the world. Let’s keep it the way it is.